Photo: Shutterstock/Dmitry Kalinovsky
During the pandemic, the turnaround time on truck maintenance has been relatively fast because there were fewer trucks on the road creating a better equilibrium between the ratio of trucks to technicians. The greatest impact of the pandemic-induced economic shutdown has been on the leisure and hospitality industries, which get most of their goods delivered by truck.
This has idled many truck fleets servicing these segments. But once the pandemic subsides and there is a full resumption of business activity, it will reaccentuate the reality of the severe shortage of techs.
There are two key reasons why there is a shortage of technicians: First, there is limited vocational training opportunities resulting in fewer younger techs joining the profession to replace retiring Baby Boomers and, secondly, increased vehicle complexity is elevating the skillset needed to work on today’s vehicles.
A frequently heard refrain is the difficulty in finding and retaining qualified mechanics. A common strategy is recruiting techs from another operation, which doesn’t resolve the long-term problem.
Getting the Service Tech’s Perspective
When service techs communicate with me, they say the No. 1 reason why technicians are leaving the profession is due to pay, in particular, the flat-rate system, which many technicians contend under-compensates them in relation to other industries requiring similar skillsets. A flat-rate compensation plan assigns standard times to complete a repair job. Techs earn a specified dollar amount for each job, regardless of how long it takes, as opposed to getting paid hourly for the time actually spent to complete the repair.
A tech’s pay is determined by the type of job and whether they can complete the repair in less time than specified by the flat-rate, which will allow them to increase their work volume. Warranty and insurance work are notorious for unrealistic repair times, making it less profitable for a tech to perform this type of work. Likewise, when business is slow, techs will earn less money. As the saying goes, if you’re not turning a wrench, you’re not earning a check. While shops use the shortage of techs to charge higher labor rates, under a flat-rate, only a fraction of that labor rate is actually used to pay the technician. About 25% of all service techs leave the industry due to dissatisfaction about pay. It is fairly easy for good mechanics to take their technical skills and earn more money in aerospace, industrial maintenance, and electronics.
Not everyone is opposed to a flat-rate, however. It is argued that most flat-rate technicians are 120-130% more efficient than those who are paid hourly, thus earning more money. Some flat-rate plans also include a performance bonus. But those numbers aren’t accurate across the board because tech productivity is contingent on the volume of work, the type of job, and how quickly you can get required out-of-stock parts.
Techs complain that labor times for most repairs are not realistic and that labor times get shorter and shorter as new vehicles are introduced. They advocate that service techs, in particular, diesel mechanics, be paid at least comparable to other skilled trades, such as electricians or plumbers. In fact, when wages are compared to electricians and plumbers, service techs are on the lower end of the scale.
But the complaints don’t stop here. As vehicle functionality is increasingly dependent on electronics and software, it has begun to stretch the skillset of some technicians. As a result, techs have to continually update their job knowledge with every new model, but complain they do not receive an increase in wage. Some shops reimburse techs for ASE classes and other certification courses, but not all.
Another issue is the out-of-pocket cost of tools. Maintenance facilities will provide the larger shop equipment, such as brake lathes, and some shops will provide a tool allowance, but most shops do not. It is the financial responsibility of techs to buy their tools.
As vehicle complexity increases, service techs are required to continually upgrade their tools. As vehicles become more computerized, the tools have also become more complicated and expensive, requiring techs to invest more in tools just to stay current.
Another reason for the shortage of technicians is due to demographics as Baby Boomers, who represent the largest age segments of technicians, reach retirement age. There is currently a talent drain among automotive and diesel technicians.
Loss through retirement of long-tenured service techs at many organizations is causing their positions to be filled with inexperienced and less capable personnel. Older skilled technicians are retiring at a rate faster than younger technicians are entering the profession to replace them. Some Baby Boomer techs are accelerating their retirement plans because shops are unwilling to spend training dollars on them because they are close to retirement. In fact, many techs say if companies paid for supplemental training there would be many older techs who would stay on the job.
Many techs retire because companies require them to take personal time off for additional training and for them to pay out-of-pocket for their own classes. An annoying issue is that techs with 30-plus years of experience resent a new tech, who is just out of school, getting paid the same rate as them with no on-the-job experience.
Situation Will Get Worse if Left Unabated
I’m not advocating that labor rates go up, but instead that a higher percentage of the existing labor rate goes to pay the service techs. This will help retain qualified talent and attract younger people entering the workforce to consider a career in automotive repair. Some of the most vocal critics advising against a career in automotive repair are seasoned techs who have grown disgruntled with the flat-rate system and are counting the days to retirement.
Author
Editor and Associate Publisher
Source: https://www.fleetfinancials.com
CUT COTS OF THE FLEET WITH OUR AUDIT PROGRAM
The audit is a key tool to know the overall status and provide the analysis, the assessment, the advice, the suggestions and the actions to take in order to cut costs and increase the efficiency and efficacy of the fleet. We propose the following fleet management audit.
